Curl error no: 6 DescriptionCould not resolve host: wikiwordplugin.com Music Theory | Jan Piano Man

Music Theory

Music theory is the study of the practices and possibilities of music. It generally derives from observation of how musicians and composers make music, but includes hypothetical speculation. Most commonly, the term describes the academic study and analysis of fundamental elements of music such as Definition of music), a more inclusive definition could be that music theory is the consideration of any sonic phenomena, including silence, as it relates to music.

Music theory is a subfield of [2] A person working in music theory is a music theorist. Methods of analysis include mathematics, graphic analysis, and, especially, analysis enabled by Western music notation. Comparative, descriptive, statistical, and other methods are also used.

The development, preservation, and transmission of music theory may be found in oral and practical music-making traditions, musical instruments, and other artifacts. For example, ancient instruments from Mesopotamia, China,[3] and prehistoric sites around the world reveal details about the music they produced and, potentially, something of the musical theory that might have been used by their makers (see History of music and Musical instrument). In ancient and living cultures around the world, the deep and long roots of music theory are clearly visible in instruments, oral traditions, and current music making. Many cultures, at least as far back as ancient Mesopotamia, Pharoanic Egypt, and ancient China have also considered music theory in more formal ways such as written treatises and music notation.

History of music theory

Ancient Egyptian musicians playing lutes in an ensemble.

The beginnings of music theory can be observed in extremely ancient instruments, artifacts, and later, depictions of performance in artworks.

As early as the Paleolithic, it appears people considered elements of music in some way. For instance, a bone flute with carefully placed finger holes found in Hohle Fels in Germany and dated c. 35,000 BCE,d’Errico, et al. 2003, 39–48.

Similar bone flutes (here.

In North America, similar flutes from the Anasazi Indian culture were found in Arizona and dated c. 600–750 CE, but again, suggest an older tradition. These instruments typically have six finger holes ranging one and a half octaves.[11]

The earliest known examples of written music theory are inscribed on clay tablets found in Iraq and Syria, some of which contain lists of intervals and other details[19]

Over time, many cultures began to record their theories of music in writing by describing practices and theory that was previously developed and passed along through oral tradition. In cultures where no written examples exist, oral traditions indicate a long history of theoretical consideration, often with unique concepts of use, performance, tuning and intervals, and other fundamental elements of music. The Vedas, the sacred texts of India (c. 1,000–500 BCE) contain theoretical discussion of music in the Sama Veda and Yajur-Veda. The Natya Shastra,[21]

The music of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica is known through the many instruments discovered. Thirty-two condor-bone flutes and thirty-seven cornet-like instruments made of deer and llama bones have been recovered from a site at Caral, Peru dating to c. 2,100 BCE.[25]

Later artwork depicts ensemble and solo performance. Taken together, this evidence does not in itself demonstrate anything about music theory in Mesoamerica from at least 2,000 BCE, though “…it is widely accepted that finds and depictions of ancient musical instruments are not only markers of musical traditions in space and time. … The information obtained from the archaeological record can be deepened considerably when ancient scripts, historical treaties, and other written sources concerning music are related. Such documents offer notes on performance practices and their sociocultural contexts. For some cultures, hints concerning ancient music theory and musical aesthetics may also be found.”[26]

Music theory in ancient Africa can also be seen in instruments .[33]

In China, a variety of wind, string, percussion instruments, and written descriptions and drawings of them from the Shang Dynasty (c. 16th to 11th century BCE), show sophisticated form and design.[38]

A set of bells from China, 5th Century BCE.

Around the time of Confucius, the ancient Greeks, notably Pythagoras (c. 530 BCE), Aristotle (c. 350 BCE),[43] Middle Eastern and Western theory diverged in different directions from ancient Greek theory and created what are now two distinctly different bodies of theory and styles of music.

As Western musical influence spread throughout the world in the 1800s, musicians adopted Western theory as an international standard—but other theoretical traditions in both textual and oral traditions remain in use. For example, the long and rich musical traditions unique to ancient and current cultures of Africa are primarily oral, but describe specific forms, genres, performance practices, tunings, and other aspects of music theory.[45]

Major contributors to the field include the ancient Greeks: Cao Rou.

Fundamentals of music

Main article: Aspect of music

Music is composed of aural phenomena, and “music theory” considers how those phenomena apply in music. Music theory considers melody, rhythm, counterpoint, harmony, form, tonal systems, scales, tuning, intervals, consonance, dissonance, durational proportions, the acoustics of pitch systems, composition, performance, orchestration, ornamentation, improvisation, electronic sound production, etc.[46]

Pitch

Main article: Pitch (music)

Middle C (261.626 Hz) info).

Pitch is the lowness or highness of a tone, for example the difference between middle C and a higher C. The frequency of the sound waves producing a pitch can be measured precisely, but the perception of pitch is more complex because we rarely hear a single frequency or pure pitch. In music, tones, even those sounded by solo instruments or voices, are usually a complex combination of frequencies, and therefore a mix of pitches. Accordingly, theorists often describe pitch as a subjective sensation.[47]

Most people appear to possess relative pitch, which means they perceive each note [50]

Intensity (loudness) can change perception of pitch. Below about 1000 Hz, perceived pitch gets lower as intensity increases. Between 1000 and 2000 Hz, pitch remains fairly constant. Above 2000 Hz, pitch rises with intensity.[53]

The difference in frequency between two pitches is called an interval. The most basic interval is the unison, which is simply two notes of the same pitch, followed by the slightly more complex octave: pitches that are either double or half the frequency of the other. The unique characteristics of octaves gave rise to the concept of what is called pitch class, an important aspect of music theory. Pitches of the same letter name that occur in different octaves may be grouped into a single “class” by ignoring the difference in octave. For example, a high C and a low C are members of the same pitch class—the class that contains all C’s. The concept of pitch class greatly aids aspects of analysis and composition.[54]

Although pitch can be identified by specific frequency, the letter names assigned to pitches are somewhat arbitrary. For example, today most orchestras assign A440 is now widely, though not exclusively, the standard for music around the world.

Pitch is also an important consideration in equal temperament is most commonly used today because it is considered the most satisfactory compromise that allows instruments of fixed tuning (e.g. the piano) to sound acceptably in tune in all keys.

Scales and modes

Main articles: Musical mode

A pattern of whole and half steps in the Ionian mode or major scale on C info).

Notes can be arranged in a variety of scales and modes. Western music theory generally divides the octave into a series of twelve tones, called a chromatic scale, within which the interval between adjacent tones is called a half step or semitone. In equal temperament each semitone is equidistant from the next, but other tuning systems are also used. Selecting tones from this set of 12 and arranging them in patterns of semitones and whole tones creates other scales.[56]

The most commonly encountered scales are the seven-toned major, the harmonic minor, the melodic minor, and the natural minor. Other examples of scales are the octatonic scale and the pentatonic or five-tone scale, which is common in folk music and blues. Non-Western cultures often use scales that do not correspond with an equally divided twelve-tone division of the octave. For example, classical Ottoman, Persian, Indian and Arabic musical systems often make use of multiples of quarter tones (half the size of a semitone, as the name indicates), for instance in ‘neutral’ seconds (three quarter tones) or ‘neutral’ thirds (seven quarter tones) – they do not normally use the quarter tone itself as a direct interval.[57]

In traditional Western notation, the scale used for a composition is usually indicated by a key signature at the beginning to designate the pitches that make up that scale. As the music progresses, the pitches used may change and introduce a different scale. Music can be transposed from one scale to another for various purposes, often to accommodate the range of a vocalist. Such transposition raises or lowers the overall pitch range, but preserves the intervallic relationships of the original scale. For example, transposition from the key of C major to D major raises all pitches of the scale of C major equally by a whole tone. Since the interval relationships remain unchanged, transposition may be unnoticed by a listener, however other qualities may change noticeably because transposition changes the relationship of the overall pitch range compared to the range of the instruments or voices that perform the music. This often affects the music’s overall sound, as well as having technical implications for the performers.[58]

The interrelationship of the keys most commonly used in Western tonal music is conveniently shown by the Indian classical music theory continues to strongly associate keys with emotional states, times of day, and other extra-musical concepts and notably, does not employ equal temperament.

Consonance and dissonance

Main article: Consonance and dissonance

Consonance and dissonance are subjective qualities of the sonority of intervals that vary widely in different cultures and over the ages.

Consonance (or concord) is the quality of an interval or chord that seems stable and complete in itself. Dissonance (or discord) is the opposite in that it feels incomplete and “wants to” resolve to a consonant interval. Dissonant intervals seem to clash. Consonant intervals seem to sound comfortable together. Commonly, perfect fourths, fifths, and octaves and all major and minor thirds and sixths are considered consonant. All others are dissonant to greater or lesser degree.[59]

Context and many other aspects can affect apparent dissonance and consonance. For example, in a Debussy prelude, a major second may sound stable and consonant, while the same interval may sound dissonant in a Bach fugue. In the Common Practice era, the perfect fourth is considered dissonant when not supported by a lower third or fifth. Since the early 20th century, Arnold Schoenberg’s concept of “emancipated” dissonance, in which traditionally dissonant intervals can be treated as “higher,” more remote consonances, has become more widely accepted.[60]

Dissonance is an essential element of music and used in most every culture and genre, not only for effect, but as a fundamental structural element to create motion and tension. J.S. Bach’s music depends in great part on the effect of dissonance. The art of melody writing depends heavily upon the selection of consonant and dissonant tones.[citation needed]

Rhythm

Main article: Rhythm

Metric levels: beat level shown in middle with division levels above and multiple levels below.

Rhythm is produced by the sequential arrangement of sounds and silences in time. time signature or meter signature specifies how many beats are in a measure, and which value of written note is counted or felt as a single beat.

Through increased stress, or variations in duration or articulation, particular tones may be accented. There are conventions in most musical traditions for regular and hierarchical accentuation of beats to reinforce a given meter. polyrhythm.

In recent years, rhythm and meter have become an important area of research among music scholars. Recent work in these areas includes books by Jonathan Kramer.

Melody

Main article: Melody

“info)

A melody is a series of tones sounding in succession that typically move toward a climax of tension then resolve to a state of rest. Because melody is such a prominent aspect in so much music, its construction and other qualities are a primary interest of music theory.

The basic elements of melody are pitch, duration, rhythm, and tempo. The tones of a melody are usually drawn from pitch systems such as scales or modes. Melody may consist, to increasing degree, of the figure, motive, semi-phrase, antecedent and consequent phrase, and period or sentence. The period may be considered the complete melody, however some examples combine two periods, or use other combinations of constituents to create larger form melodies.[62]

Chord

Main article: Chord (music)

Harmony

Main article: Harmony

Timbre

Main article: Timbre

Timbre, sometimes called “color”, or “tone color,” is the principal phenomenon that allows us to distinguish one instrument from another when both play at the same pitch and volume, a quality of a voice or instrument often described in terms like bright, dull, shrill, etc. It is of considerable interest in music theory, especially because it is one component of music that has as yet, no standardized nomenclature. It has been called “…the psychoacoustician’s multidimensional waste-basket category for everything that cannot be labeled pitch or loudness,”frequencies, attack and release envelopes, and other qualities that comprise a tone.

Timbre is principally determined by two things: (1) the relative balance of overtones produced by a given instrument due its construction (e.g. shape, material), and (2) the envelope of the sound (including changes in the overtone structure over time). Timbre varies widely between different instruments, voices, and to lesser degree, between instruments of the same type due to variations in their construction, and significantly, the performer’s technique. The timbre of most instruments can be changed by employing different techniques while playing. For example, the timbre of a trumpet changes when a mute is inserted into the bell, the player changes their embouchure, or volume.

A voice can change its timbre by the way the performer manipulates their vocal apparatus, (e.g. the shape of the vocal cavity or mouth). Musical notation frequently specifies alteration in timbre by changes in sounding technique, volume, accent, and other means. These are indicated variously by symbolic and verbal instruction. For example, the word dolce (sweetly) indicates a non-specific, but commonly understood soft and “sweet” timbre. Sul tasto instructs a string player to bow near or over the fingerboard to produce a less brilliant sound. Cuivre instructs a brass player to produce a forced and stridently brassy sound. Accent symbols like marcato (^) and dynamic indications (pp) can also indicate changes in timbre.

Dynamics

Main article: Dynamics (music)

An illustration of hairpins in musical notation.

In music, “phons. In music notation, however, dynamics are not treated as absolute values, but as relative ones. Because they are usually measured subjectively, there are factors besides amplitude that affect the performance or perception of intensity, such as timbre, vibrato, and articulation.

The conventional indications of dynamics are abbreviations for Italian words like forte (f) for loud and piano (p) for soft. These two basic notations are modified by indications including mezzo piano (mp) for moderately soft (literally “half soft”) and mezzo forte (mf) for moderately loud, sforzando or sforzato (sfz) for a surging or “pushed” attack, or fortepiano (fp) for a loud attack with a sudden decrease to a soft level. The full span of these markings usually range from a nearly inaudible pianissississimo (pppp) to a loud-as-possible fortissississimo (ffff).

Greater extremes of pppppp and fffff and nuances such as p+ or più piano are sometimes found. Other systems of indicating volume are also used in both notation and analysis: dB (decibels), numerical scales, colored or different sized notes, words in languages other than Italian, and symbols such as those for progressively increasing volume (crescendo) or decreasing volume (decrescendo), often called “hairpins” when indicated with diverging or converging lines as shown in the graphic above.

Articulation

Main article: Articulation (music)

Examples of articulations. From left to right: tenuto.

Articulation is the manner in which the performer sounds notes. For example, legato performs the notes in a smoothly joined sequence with no separation. Articulation is often described rather than quantified, therefore there is room to interpret how to execute precisely each articulation.

For example, staccato is often referred to as “separated” or “detached” rather than having a defined or numbered amount by which to reduce the notated duration. Violin players use a variety of techniques to perform different qualities of staccato. The manner in which a performer decides to execute a given articulation is usually based on the context of the piece or phrase, but many articulation symbols and verbal instructions depend on the instrument and musical period (e.g. viol, wind; classical, baroque; etc.).

There are a set of articulations that most all instruments and voices perform in common. They are, in order of long to short: legato (smooth, connected); spicatto for bowed strings, where the bow bounces off the string.

Texture

Main article: Musical texture

Form or structure

Main article: Musical form

Analysis

Main articles: Transformational theory

Music perception and cognition

Further information: Ray Jackendoff

Expression

Main article: Musical expression

Performance and style

Main article: Music genre

Mathematics

Main article: Music and mathematics

Serial composition and set theory

Tone row from info)

Further information: Allen Forte

Musical semiotics

Further information: Jean-Jacques Nattiez

Music subjects

Notation

Main articles: Sheet music

Tibetan musical score from the 19th century.

Musical notation is the written or symbolized representation of music. This is most often achieved by the use of commonly understood graphic symbols and written verbal instructions and their abbreviations. Computer hand signs are also used to symbolically represent music, primarily in teaching.

In standard Western music notation, tones are represented graphically by symbols (notes) placed on a staff or staves, the vertical axis corresponding to pitch and the horizontal axis corresponding to time. Note head shapes, stems, flags, ties and dots are used to indicate duration. Additional symbols indicate keys, dynamics, accents, rests, etc. Verbal instructions are often used to indicate tempo, technique, and other aspects.

There are many systems of music notation from different cultures and different ages. Traditional Western notation evolved during the Middle Ages and remains an area of experimentation and innovation.[66]

See also

Notes

  1. OED 2005.
  2. Palisca and Bent n.d., Theory, theorists. 1. Definitions.
  3. Latham 2002, 15–17.
  4. Conrad, Malina, and Münzel 2009, 738.
  5. Zhang and Kuem 2005, passim.
  6. Zhang, Xiao, and Lee 2004, 769, 775.
  7. Zhang, Harboolt, Wang, and Kong 1999, passim.
  8. Zhang and Kuen 2004, passim.
  9. Lee and Shen 1999, passim.
  10. Bakkegard and Morris 1961, passim.
  11. Gross n.d..
  12. Mirelman 2013a, passim.
  13. Mirelman 2013b, passim.
  14. Crickmore 2012, 57.
  15. Civil 2010, text 6.3.1.
  16. Laroche 1955, passim.
  17. Schaeffer and Nougayrol n.d., 463, cuneiform text on 487.
  18. Dietrich and Loretz 1975, passim.
  19. Martin 1994, 166.
  20. Muni 1951.
  21. Bakshi 2005, passim.
  22. Ross 2002, passim.
  23. Haas and Creamer 2001, passim.
  24. Cheong 2012, passim.
  25. Brill 2012, passim.
  26. Both 2009, 1.
  27. page needed]21–28.
  28. page needed].
  29. Tracey 1969, 93.
  30. page needed].
  31. page needed].
  32. Henning 2012.
  33. Chernoff 1981, passim.
  34. Thrasher 2000, 2.
  35. Randel 2003, 260–62.
  36. Lu 2005, 140.
  37. Routledge 2008, 2:1201–1202.
  38. Confucius 1999, Chapter VI.
  39. Barnes 1984, Politics book VIII, chapts. 5–7, pp. 2125–29.
  40. Aristoxenus 1902.
  41. Ptolemy 1999.
  42. Boethius 1989.
  43. Shiloah 2003, 24.
  44. Kubik 2010, passim.
  45. Ekwueme 1974, passim.
  46. Palisca and Bent n.d..
  47. page needed].
  48. Lloyd and Boyle 1978, 142.
  49. Benade 1960, 31.
  50. Josephs 1967, 53–54.
  51. Houtsma 1995, 269.
  52. Despopoulos and Silbernagl 2003, 362.
  53. Nave n.d..
  54. page needed].
  55. Cavanagh 1999.
  56. page needed].
  57. page needed].
  58. Forsyth 1935, 73-74.
  59. page needed].
  60. page needed].
  61. page needed].
  62. Stein 1979, 3–47.
  63. page needed].
  64. Mannell n.d..
  65. Castan 2009.
  66. page needed].

Sources

  • Aristoxenus (1902), The Harmonics of Aristoxenus, edited by Henry Marcam, Oxford: The Clarendon Press  [clarification needed]
  • Bakkegard, B. M., and Elizabeth Ann Morris (1961). “Seventh Century Flutes from Arizona”. Ethnomusicology 5, no. 3 (September): 184–86. 10.2307/924518.
  • Bakshi, Haresh (2005), 101 Raga-s for the 21st Century and Beyond: A Music Lover’s Guide to Hindustani Music, Victoria, BC: Trafford  ISBN 9781412046770; ISBN 9781412231350 (ebook).
  • Barnes, Latham (1984), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, help)
  • Bartlette, Christopher, and Steven G. Laitz (2010). Graduate Review of Tonal Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-537698-2.
  • Benade, Arthur H. (1960), Horns, Strings, and Harmony, Science Study Series S 11, Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc. 
  • Billmeier, Uschi (1999). Mamady Keïta: A Life for the Djembé—Traditional Rhythms of the Malinké, fourth edition. Kirchhasel-Uhlstädt: Arun-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-935581-52-3.
  • Boretz, Benjamin (1995). Meta-Variations: Studies in the Foundations of Musical Thought. Red Hook, New York: Open Space.
  • Benward, Bruce, and Marilyn Nadine Saker (2003).[full citation needed]
  • Benward, Bruce, and Marilyn Nadine Saker (2009). Music in Theory and Practice, eighth edition, vol. 2. Boston: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-310188-0.
  • Bent, Ian D., and Anthony Pople (2001). “Analysis.” The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition, edited by John Tyrrell. London: Macmillan Publishers.
  • Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus (1989), Fundamentals of Music, translated and edited by Claude V. Palisca, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, ISBN 978-0-300-03943-6 
  • Both, Arnd Adje (2009). “Music Archaeology: Some Methodological and Theoretical Considerations“. Yearbook for Traditional Music 41:1–11.
  • Brill, Mark (2012). “Music of the Ancient Maya: New Venues of Research”. Paper presented at AMS-SW Conference Fall 2012. Texas State University[full citation needed]
  • Castan, Gerd (2009). “Musical Notation Codes“. Music-Notation.info (Accessed 1 May 2010).
  • Cavanagh, Lynn (1999). “A Brief History of the Establishment of International Standard Pitch A=440 Hertz” (PDF).  (Accessed 1 May 2010)
  • Charry, Eric (2000). Mande Music: Traditional and Modern Music of the Maninka and Mandinka of Western Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. help)
  • Cheong, Kong F. (2012). “A Description of the Ceramic Musical Instruments Excavated from the North Group of Pacbitun, Belize”. In Pacbitun Regional Archaeological Project, Report on the 2011 Field Season, edited by Terry G. Powis,[page needed]. Belmopan, Belize: Institute of Archaeology.
  • Chernoff, John (1981). African Rhythm and African Sensibility: Aesthetics and Social Action in African Musical Idioms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-10345-7.
  • Civil, Miguel (2010). “The Lexical Texts in the Schøyen Collection”. Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 12:203–14.
  • Confucius (1999), The Analects of Confucius, edited by Roger T. Ames and Henry Rosemont Jr.[0345434072 
  • Conrad, Nicholas J., Maria Malina, and Susanne C. Münzel (2009). “New Flutes Document the Earliest Musical Tradition in Southwestern Germany”. Nature 460, no. 7256 (6 August): 737–40
  • Crickmore, Leon (2012). “A Musicological Interpretation of the Akkadian Term Sihpu”. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 64:57–64. 10.5615/jcunestud.64.0057
  • d’Errico, Francesco, Christopher Henshilwood, Graeme Lawson, Marian Vanhaeren, Anne-Marie Tillier, Marie Soressi, Frederique Bresson, Bruno Maureille, April Nowell, Joseba Lakarra, Lucinda Backwell, Michele Julien (2003). “Archaeological Evidence for the Emergence of Language, Symbolism, and Music—An Alternative Multidisciplinary Perspective“. Journal of World Prehistory 17, no. 1 (March): 1–70.
  • Despopoulos, Agamemnon, and Stefan Silbernagl (2003). Color Atlas of Physiology, fifth edition. New York and Stuttgart: Thieme. ISBN 3-13-545005-8.
  • Dietrich, Manfred; Oswald Loretz (1975). “Kollationen zum Musiktext aus Ugarit”. Ugarit-Forschungen 7: 521–22. 
  • Ekwueme, Laz E. N. (1974). “Concepts of African Musical Theory”. Journal of Black Studies 5, no. 1 (September):[page needed]
  • Forsyth, Cecil (1935), Orchestration (second ed.), New York: Dover Publications, help).
  • Gross, Clint. “Anasazi Flutes from the Broken Flute Cave”. Flutopedia. Clint Gross, Phd. Retrieved December 4, 2014. 
  • Haas, Shady R.; J. W. Creamer (2001). “Dating Caral, a Pre-ceramic Site in the Supe Valley on the Central Coast of Peru”. Science 292: 723–726. doi:10.1126/science.1059519. PMID 11326098. 
  • Harnsberger, Lindsey C. (1997). “Articulation”. Essential Dictionary of Music: Definitions, Composers, Theory, Instrument and Vocal Ranges, second edition. The Essential Dictionary Series. Los Angeles: Alfred Publishing Co. ISBN 0-88284-728-7.
  • Hartmann, William M. (2005). Signals, Sound, and Sensation, corrected, fifth printing. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics; New York: Springer. ISBN 1563962837.
  • Henning, Michi (July 3, 2012). “Harmonics of Tones and Slaps”. Djembe Forum.  ]
  • Houtsma, Adrianus J. M. (1995). “Pitch Perception“. In[full citation needed], 267–95. Academic Press.
  • Huang, Xiang-peng (黄翔鹏) (1989). “Wuyang Jiahu gudi de ceyin yanjiu (舞阳贾湖骨笛的测音研究)” [Pitch Measurement Studies of Bone Flutes from Jiahu of Wuyang County]. Wenwu (文物) [Cultural Relics], no. 1:15–17. Reprinted in 黄翔鹏文存 [Collected Essays of Huang Xiang-Peng], 2 vols, edited by Zhongguo Yishu Yanjiuyuan Yinyue Yanjiusuo (中国艺术研究院音乐研究所), 557–60. Ji’nan, China: Shandong Wenyi Chubanshe, 2007. ISBN 978-7-5329-2669-5.
  • Fred Lerdahl (1981). “Generative Music Theory and Its Relation to Psychology.” Journal of Music Theory 25, no.1:45–90.
  • Josephs, Jess L. (1967), The Physics of Musical Sound, Princeton, Toronto, London: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. 
  • Kliewer, Vernon (1975). “Melody: Linear Aspects of Twentieth-Century Music”. In Aspects of Twentieth-Century Music, edited by Gary Wittlich, 270-301. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-049346-5.
  • Kostka, Stefan, and Dorothy Payne (2004). Tonal Harmony, fifth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Kramer, Jonathan (1988). The Time of Music. New York: Schirmer Books.
  • Kubik, Gerhard (1998), Kalimba – Nsansi – Mbira. Lamellophone in Afrika, Berlin: Museum fur Volkerkunde, help)
  • Kubik, Gerhard (2010), Theory of African Music, 2 vols., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, help)
  • Laroche, Emmanuel (1955), Le palais royal d’ Ugarit 3: Textes accadiens et hourrites des archives est, ouest et centrales, Paris: C. Klincksieck 
  • Latham, Alison (ed.) (2002), The Oxford Companion to Music, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-866212-2 
  • Lee, Yuan-Yuan, and Sin-Yan Shen (1999). Chinese Musical Instruments. Chinese Music Monograph Series. Chicago: Chinese Music Society of North America Press. ISBN 1880464039.
  • Lerdahl, Fred (2001). Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lewin, David (1987). Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Lloyd, Llewellyn S., and Hugh Boyle (1978). Intervals, Scales and Temperaments. New York: St. Martin’s Press. ISBN 0-312-42533-3.
  • Lu, Liancheng (2005). “The Eastern Zhou and the Growth of Regionalism”. In The Formation of Chinese Civilization, edited by Sarah Allan,[page needed]. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-09382-7.
  • McAdams, Stephen, and Albert Bregman (1979). “Hearing Musical Streams“. Computer Music Journal 3, no. 4 (December): 26–43, 60.
  • Mannell, Robert (n.d.). “Spectral Analysis of Sounds”. Macquarie University. 
  • Martin, Litchfield West (1994). “The Babylonian Musical Notation and the Hurrian Melodic Texts”. Music and Letters 75, no. 2 (May): 161–79
  • Mirelman, Sam. 2013a. “Tuning Procedures in Ancient Iraq”. Analytical Approaches to World Music 2, no. 2:[page needed]
  • Mirelman, Sam. 2013b. “Tuning Procedures in Ancient Iraq“. Analytical Approaches to World Music 2, no. 2:43–56.[clarification needed]
  • Mirelman, Sam, and Theo Krispijn (2009). “The Old Babylonian Tuning Text UET VI/3 899”. Iraq 71:43–52.
  • Muni, Bharat (1951). Natya Shastra. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal. 
  • Nave, R. (n.d.). “Frequencies for Maximum Sensitivity of Human Hearing” Hyperphysics website, Georgia State University (accessed 5 December 2014).
  • “theory, n.1“. Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. September 2005. 
  • Olson, Steve (2011). “A Grand Unified Theory of Music“. Princeton Alumni Weekly 111, no. 7 (February 9) (Online edition accessed 25 September 2012).
  • Palisca, Claude V., and Ian D. Bent. n.d. “Theory, Theorists”. Grove Music Online, edited by Deane Root. Oxford University Press (accessed 17 December 2014).
  • Ptolemy (1999), Harmonics, Mnemosyne, bibliotheca classica Batava: Supplementum 203, translation and commentary by by Jon Solomon, Leiden and Boston: Brill Academic Publications, help)
  • Randel, Don Michael (2003), The Harvard Dictionary of Music (4th ed.), Harvard University Press, pp. 260–262, full citation needed]
  • Read, Gardner (1979), Music Notation, Taplinger Publishing .[full citation needed]
  • Ross, John (August 2002). “First City in the New World?”. Smithsonian Museum:[page needed]. 
  • Routledge (2008), The Concise Garland Encyclopedia of World Music (1st ed.),[help)
  • Schaeffer, Claude; Nougayrol, Jean, eds. (n.d.). “Documents en langue houritte provenent de Ras Shamra”. Ugaritica 5: Nouveaux textes accadiens, hourrites et ugaritiques des archives et bibliothèques privées d’Ugarit (Paris: Bibliothèque archéologique et historique / Institut français d’archéologie de Beyrouth 80): 462–96. 
  • Shiloah, Amnon (2003). Music in the World of Islam: A Socio-Cultural Study. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 0814329705. 
  • Stein, Leon (1979), Structure and Style: The Study and Analysis of Musical Forms, Princeton, NJ: Summy-Birchard Music, ISBN 0-87487-164-6 
  • Stevens, S. S., J. Volkmann, and E. B. Newman (1937). “A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 8, no. 3:185–90.
  • Stone, Kurt (1980). Music Notation in the Twentieth Century. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. ISBN 978-0-393-95053-3. 
  • Thrasher, Alan (2000), Chinese Musical Instruments, London and New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-590777-9 
  • Touma, Habib Hassan (1996). The Music of the Arabs, new expanded edition, translated by Laurie Schwartz. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press. ISBN 0-931340-88-8.
  • Tracey, Hugh (1969). “The Mbira Class of African Instruments in Rhodesia”. African Music Society Journal 4, no. 3:78–95.
  • Wu, Zhao (吴钊) (1991). “Jiahu guiling gudi yu Zhongguo yinyue wenming zhi yuan (贾湖龟铃骨笛与中国音乐文明之源)” [The relation of Jiahu bone flutes and turtle shell shakers to the origin of Chinese music]. Wenwu (文物) [Cultural Relics], no. 3: 50–55.
  • Wulstan, David (1968). “The Tuning of the Babylonian Harp”. Iraq 30: 215–28.
  • Yamaguchi, Masaya (2000). The Complete Thesaurus of Musical Scales. New York: Charles Colin. ISBN 0-9676353-0-6. 
  • Zhang, Juzhong; Harboolt, Garman; Wang, Cahngsui; Kong, Zhaochen (September 23, 1999). “Oldest playable musical instrument found at Jiahu early Neolithic site in China” (PDF). Nature. 
  • Zhang, Juzhong; Yun Kuen (2004). “The early development of music. Analysis of the Jiahu Bone Flutes”. Music Archaeology. 
  • Zhang, Juzhong, and L. K. Kuem (2005). “The Magic Flutes”. Natural History Magazine 114:43–49
  • Zhang, Juzhong, X. Xiao, and Y, K. Lee (2004). “The Early Development of Music: Analysis of the Jiahu Bone Flutes”. Antiquity 78, no. 302:769–79

Further reading

External links

Wikibooks has more on the topic of: Music theory
Music theory
Classical history
Education and study
Production
By sovereign state
Lists
See also
Authority control



Source: Wikipedia

css.php